Hiring teams evaluating InterviewAgent.ai alongside HiringGenie are comparing two products built for the same job: an AI that runs the first-round interview, scores answers against a rubric and ranks the shortlist. With so much overlap, the details decide it. InterviewAgent.ai details come from interviewagent.ai, checked on 22 October 2026. HiringGenie details come from our product and pricing pages. The short answer HiringGenie: video interviews with an on-screen AI interviewer or voice interviews, a scorecard and ranked shortlist, and a Free plan with 10 interviews a month. InterviewAgent.ai: voice or video first-round interviews with rubric scoring, ranked shortlists, consent and AI disclosure built in, and bias-audit reports. Paid plans start at $149 a month and there is no free plan. Both publish prices, so this comparison comes down to the interview experience, report quality, plan limits and which features sit on which tier. What does each platform focus on? HiringGenie HiringGenie builds the interview from your job description and questions. Candidates join from one link, the AI interviewer follows up on their answers, and recruiters review a recording, transcript, scorecard with strengths and improvement areas, and a ranked shortlist. InterviewAgent.ai InterviewAgent.ai asks you to define the role, questions and scoring rubric. Candidates consent and are told they are speaking with an AI, then interview by voice or video. Each score links to the transcript line behind it, and recruiters can override scores. The company says it never auto-hires or auto-rejects and provides bias-audit reports aligned to EEOC guidance and NYC Local Law 144. Feature comparison at a glance Interview format: both offer voice and video AI interviews with follow-up questions. Scoring transparency: InterviewAgent.ai links each score to the transcript line that produced it. HiringGenie provides the transcript, recording and scorecard together. Disclosure and consent: InterviewAgent.ai builds consent and AI disclosure into every interview. Check how each vendor handles notices required in your jurisdiction. Bias audits: InterviewAgent.ai provides bias-audit reports on all plans. Request audit documentation from every vendor if you hire in New York City or other regulated locations. ATS: InterviewAgent.ai offers ATS export from Growth and integrations from Scale. Confirm your ATS with both vendors. Free access: HiringGenie has a Free plan. InterviewAgent.ai says every plan is paid. Pricing: compare equivalent usage, not headline figures InterviewAgent.ai lists three main plans: Starter at $149 a month for up to 100 interviews and 2 seats; Growth at $399 for 300 interviews and 5 seats; and Scale at $999 for 750 interviews and 15 seats. It says yearly payment is 50% off. Check its pricing page to confirm whether the listed prices are monthly or yearly rates. HiringGenie plans Free: $0 a month, 10 interviews, 1 seat and 1 active job description. Starter: $319 a month billed yearly ($399 billed monthly), 100 interviews, 2 seats and 5 active job descriptions. Growth: $479 a month billed yearly ($599 billed monthly), 200 interviews, 5 seats and 10 active job descriptions. Extra interviews cost $4.00 each. Enterprise: custom pricing with unlimited interviews, seats and job descriptions. At list price InterviewAgent.ai’s entry plan costs less than HiringGenie Starter for 100 interviews. HiringGenie Starter includes 5 active job descriptions and HiringGenie’s Free plan lets you test before paying. Compare the plan you would actually need, including seats, roles and ATS features. Which platform is a better fit? Consider HiringGenie if you want an on-screen AI interviewer, a free way to test on a real role, and a scorecard and shortlist your team can review quickly. Consider InterviewAgent.ai if the lowest entry price matters most, or you want bias-audit reports and score-to-transcript links on every plan. A five-step pilot before you decide Choose the roles: select two genuine vacancies with different candidate profiles. Match the setup: create equivalent interviews in both systems using the same evaluation rubric. Invite a test group: use a small, consented group across desktop and mobile devices. Compare the output: look at completion, review effort, accessibility and how clear the candidate evidence is. Record the costs: note total cost, integration effort and any exceptions that needed a recruiter. Common questions Is InterviewAgent.ai cheaper than HiringGenie? At list price its Starter plan is $149 a month for 100 interviews, compared with HiringGenie Starter at $319 billed yearly or $399 monthly. Plan contents differ, so compare equivalent features. Does InterviewAgent.ai have a free plan? No. Its website says every plan is paid. HiringGenie offers a Free plan with 10 interviews a month. Do both tools keep a human in the decision? Yes. InterviewAgent.ai says a recruiter makes every final call, and HiringGenie leaves final decisions with the hiring team. Can AI interview software make the final hiring decision? An AI score can help organize evidence, but hiring teams should use appropriate human oversight, consistent criteria and applicable employment and privacy safeguards. Final takeaway The right HiringGenie vs InterviewAgent.ai decision depends on your hiring process. Start with a real role and evaluate candidate experience, useful evidence, recruiter time and complete pricing. Related reading: AI Interview Scorecards: Templates and Examples, How Long Should an AI Screening Interview Be? and AI Interview Software Pricing. Next step: Explore HiringGenie’s product, view pricing or request a demo using your own job description.
